![]() Yet its emphasis on patterns of interaction and cooperation should not be neglected either. Civic nationalism has been widely criticized for failing to account for group boundaries and shared culture. The distinction between solidarity and identity bears on the much‐disputed dichotomy between ethnic and civic nationalism. Although theoretical discussion of national solidarity is sparse, three central approaches in the field can be highlighted: understanding solidarity as a byproduct of identity, as a relationship between strangers and as an extension of sociability. Whereas the former inquiry centres on group classifications and commonalities, the latter examines cooperation and patterns of interaction among group members. This article argues for an analytic distinction between questions of collective identity and questions of solidarity in studies of nationhood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |